<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ballookey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ballookey.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ballookey.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:47:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Tits only by admin</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=741&#038;cpage=1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=741#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve! Glad to see you&#039;re giving comments a second chance on your blog, too. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve! Glad to see you&#8217;re giving comments a second chance on your blog, too. <img src='http://ballookey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tits only by steve</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=741&#038;cpage=1#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=741#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant &quot;your&quot; - not &quot;our&quot; -that&#039;s what happens when you type too fast and can&#039;t type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant &#8220;your&#8221; &#8211; not &#8220;our&#8221; -that&#8217;s what happens when you type too fast and can&#8217;t type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tits only by steve</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=741&#038;cpage=1#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=741#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Haaa! Like I said, you tell it like it is! I like how you put it too, which really sums it up for me. I think I actually read about it in a book my wife got last year about selling our work online. I need to see if she still has it. Anyhow, great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haaa! Like I said, you tell it like it is! I like how you put it too, which really sums it up for me. I think I actually read about it in a book my wife got last year about selling our work online. I need to see if she still has it. Anyhow, great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You better believe I&#8217;m judging you by admin</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=726&#038;cpage=1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=726#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Actually I don&#039;t see any ads when I visit your site. It may be that some readers have installed a Google toolbar, or a toolbar for some other site which is serving the ads. Since most people aren&#039;t very computer savvy, they don&#039;t know when their browsing experience is corrupted by something THEY&#039;VE done, rather than something happening on the site they&#039;re visiting. 

The only thing I see that your site has is Wordpress Snapshots when you hover over certain terms.

If you can&#039;t see the same thing that your visitors are seeing, chances are this is because of something they&#039;ve done to their computers.

Also, I should have specified, but I wasn&#039;t really talking about AdSense ads, or the like, where they&#039;re little unobtrusive text ads that site administrators can add to try and get a little beer money. ;) I&#039;m talking about the larger ad networks that display larger graphic ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I don&#8217;t see any ads when I visit your site. It may be that some readers have installed a Google toolbar, or a toolbar for some other site which is serving the ads. Since most people aren&#8217;t very computer savvy, they don&#8217;t know when their browsing experience is corrupted by something THEY&#8217;VE done, rather than something happening on the site they&#8217;re visiting. </p>
<p>The only thing I see that your site has is Wordpress Snapshots when you hover over certain terms.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t see the same thing that your visitors are seeing, chances are this is because of something they&#8217;ve done to their computers.</p>
<p>Also, I should have specified, but I wasn&#8217;t really talking about AdSense ads, or the like, where they&#8217;re little unobtrusive text ads that site administrators can add to try and get a little beer money. <img src='http://ballookey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m talking about the larger ad networks that display larger graphic ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You better believe I&#8217;m judging you by henniemavis</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=726&#038;cpage=1#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>henniemavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=726#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I just recently discovered that it appears I do not have control over the ads which show to my readers? I&#039;ve several readers comment that my posts had Google Ads listed beneath them, though I have been unable to see them myself. The ads are not there when I look. One viewer was kind enough to send me a screen-grab PDF, so I could see what he saw. I&#039;m very new to blogging &amp; very inexperienced at computer usage in general... so now I am trying to figure out how to get my own domain &amp; migrate my blog there (still keeping WP). I am hoping that will stop the unwanted ads riding along on my posts like ticks? The Terms of Service I clicked thru for a &quot;free&quot; blog must allow them to do this, so I gave them permission when I clicked &quot;Accept Terms&quot; I suspect. Still... somewhat crummy, I thought. Being new to this stuff is frustrating. I only have so much time to put toward learning this stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I just recently discovered that it appears I do not have control over the ads which show to my readers? I&#8217;ve several readers comment that my posts had Google Ads listed beneath them, though I have been unable to see them myself. The ads are not there when I look. One viewer was kind enough to send me a screen-grab PDF, so I could see what he saw. I&#8217;m very new to blogging &#038; very inexperienced at computer usage in general&#8230; so now I am trying to figure out how to get my own domain &#038; migrate my blog there (still keeping WP). I am hoping that will stop the unwanted ads riding along on my posts like ticks? The Terms of Service I clicked thru for a &#8220;free&#8221; blog must allow them to do this, so I gave them permission when I clicked &#8220;Accept Terms&#8221; I suspect. Still&#8230; somewhat crummy, I thought. Being new to this stuff is frustrating. I only have so much time to put toward learning this stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Fun: Prop Money by admin</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=723&#038;cpage=1#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=723#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Good choice - It&#039;s a favorite of mine right now. Well, I guess it&#039;s a favorite of all designers with any taste, since I see it everywhere. I love the rich selection of weights they make for each typeface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good choice &#8211; It&#8217;s a favorite of mine right now. Well, I guess it&#8217;s a favorite of all designers with any taste, since I see it everywhere. I love the rich selection of weights they make for each typeface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Fun: Prop Money by Micah</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=723&#038;cpage=1#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=723#comment-417</guid>
		<description>H&amp;FJ on currency? That&#039;ll be the day! ;)

(Amusingly, for a book I recently designed I used Archer for the titling/headings.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H&amp;FJ on currency? That&#8217;ll be the day! <img src='http://ballookey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(Amusingly, for a book I recently designed I used Archer for the titling/headings.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aya Rosen by mary taitt</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>mary taitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=722#comment-415</guid>
		<description>These are super, thanks for sharing--and I love the kaleidoscope image below, frivolous or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are super, thanks for sharing&#8211;and I love the kaleidoscope image below, frivolous or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still Not Getting It by admin</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=719&#038;cpage=1#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=719#comment-413</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re 100% right—that that&#039;s what the publishing industry is thinking—however I think they&#039;re ass-backwards on that thinking. 

The problem is that people are used to paying a certain price and the typical customer isn&#039;t familiar enough with the industry to know why they&#039;re charging more for the digital version. The complaints I see over and over on iTunes is that people think that because there&#039;s no paper or postage, the digital version should be cheaper.

So it doesn&#039;t matter what the reality of the situation is, in order for people to get on board with this new format, for the publishers to make any money at all in new digital media, they have to give the customers something to buy. If 90% of potential customers are scared off by what seems like an outrageous price, then there won&#039;t be an audience to sell advertising too. Publishers will include that the whole digital thing was a failure, that people don&#039;t want to pay for digital content.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The comments on the iTunes app store are proof that people are willing to pay. The publishers have to be willing to forego some initial ad revenue in order to present the customer with a price and product that is in line with what they&#039;re expecting. Even give a little more by way of digital exclusive content. By doing this, they can grow their audience and then sell that audience, ready-made to the advertisers.

Or simply loose out to small time content producers who are willing to work with smaller but more targeted ad networks and who are willing to give more to build a real audience.

In the short term, this wouldn&#039;t even necessarily mean lost revenue for the publishers. As you said, they&#039;re already going to the large part of the expense of producing the content and traditional advertising will float that a little longer while they try out digital models. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re 100% right—that that&#8217;s what the publishing industry is thinking—however I think they&#8217;re ass-backwards on that thinking. </p>
<p>The problem is that people are used to paying a certain price and the typical customer isn&#8217;t familiar enough with the industry to know why they&#8217;re charging more for the digital version. The complaints I see over and over on iTunes is that people think that because there&#8217;s no paper or postage, the digital version should be cheaper.</p>
<p>So it doesn&#8217;t matter what the reality of the situation is, in order for people to get on board with this new format, for the publishers to make any money at all in new digital media, they have to give the customers something to buy. If 90% of potential customers are scared off by what seems like an outrageous price, then there won&#8217;t be an audience to sell advertising too. Publishers will include that the whole digital thing was a failure, that people don&#8217;t want to pay for digital content.</p>
<p>Nothing could be further from the truth. The comments on the iTunes app store are proof that people are willing to pay. The publishers have to be willing to forego some initial ad revenue in order to present the customer with a price and product that is in line with what they&#8217;re expecting. Even give a little more by way of digital exclusive content. By doing this, they can grow their audience and then sell that audience, ready-made to the advertisers.</p>
<p>Or simply loose out to small time content producers who are willing to work with smaller but more targeted ad networks and who are willing to give more to build a real audience.</p>
<p>In the short term, this wouldn&#8217;t even necessarily mean lost revenue for the publishers. As you said, they&#8217;re already going to the large part of the expense of producing the content and traditional advertising will float that a little longer while they try out digital models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aya Rosen by Aya</title>
		<link>http://ballookey.com/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Aya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballookey.com/?p=722#comment-412</guid>
		<description>the texts were all taken from a sex advice online forum I was active in a couple of years back. Images were taken from vintage penthouse magazines.

It was a body of work made to express the difference between what sex is and what we are meant to believe sex is.

I&#039;m so glad you like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the texts were all taken from a sex advice online forum I was active in a couple of years back. Images were taken from vintage penthouse magazines.</p>
<p>It was a body of work made to express the difference between what sex is and what we are meant to believe sex is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad you like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
